Blogging from Nova Scotia!

August 15th, 2010

Hurray! I have gotten this to work. (It’s been a little tricky because my laptop can’t handle certain WiFi networks, and I can’t edit photos on my iPad.)

Today we drove to Peggy’s Cove, one of the best known Nova Scotian locations. Mostly for this lighthouse, and the unique rocky landscape:

It is lovely, but at little overwhelmed with tourists. Only a few dozen people actually live in the village, and at least three times as many tourists there with us in the short period we were visiting. But it was really interesting seeing what a small fishing village on the coast looks like:

Then we zipped along to Lunenburg, which is full of gorgeous historic houses (the oldest was built in 1780). Here’s one of our favourites:

We enjoyed the varied color schemes many of the houses are painted in. This row gives a good example of what I mean:

Much brighter and more interesting than the plain old gray/brown/beige back home! :)

All this is giving me a much stronger sense of the town in THE WAY WE FALL. I’m still looking for a house that feels like Kaelyn’s house, though–the ones pictured above are too fancy, of course!

Off to Shelburne tomorrow–I’ll blog again later if the WiFi circumstances align.

Holiday time!

August 13th, 2010

In the next couple of weeks, I’m going to take two trips: one to Nova Scotia, and one up to cottage country.

Neither of these trips is totally (or even mostly) for relaxation. THE WAY WE FALL is set in Nova Scotia, and I wanted to take the opportunity to explore the landscape and towns firsthand before I start editorial revisions. And I’m going to cottage country for my critique group’s fourth annual writing retreat! I hope to finish my current WIP while I’m there, and maybe do some additional brainstorming for FALL’s sequel as well. But I’m sure there’ll be lots of fun had in both places as well. :)

Naturally, this means that blogging in the next couple weeks will be infrequent (if not non-existent). I’m considering attempting at least a few posts on the go, but have never managed that before, so we’ll see. But even if there’s total blog silence, when I get back there will be many pictures and stories to share!

As a heads up: I will have internet access in most of the places I’m staying but will only be checking e-mail sporadically, so if you try to get in touch, it may take longer than usual for me to get back to you.

Hope all of you enjoy the rest of your summer just as much as I will!

Reader Question: Other careers

August 12th, 2010

If you weren’t an author, what would your dream job be?

This is hard for me to imagine, because even if I wasn’t published at this point in my life, as long as I could write I’d still be writing and pursuing that dream. And it’s hard to imagine not being able to write!

I’d probably be doing something similar to what’s been my day job for the last ten years. I’m a behavioral therapist for kids and teens with special needs, and I really enjoy working with young people (just as I like writing for them!) and knowing I’m helping those who need it become more independent and successful in whatever they end up wanting to do.

Event reminder: Author Day at Toronto Eaton Centre

August 11th, 2010

A quick reminder for Toronto area folks: on Sunday, August 22nd I’ll be appearing at the Indigo – Toronto Eaton Centre in the teen section, from 1pm to 3pm.

I’ll have bookmarks and buttons to hand out, and would love to chat with any readers who stop by! And of course I’ll happily answer questions about my forthcoming books. :)

As part of Indigo’s Local Author Days, there should also be other authors in different sections of the store for you to meet.

Hope to see you there!

Reader Question: Editorial process

August 6th, 2010

What I want to know more about is the editorial process you went through with GHOST–-how long was your editorial letter, how many of them did you get, how big were the changes, how many drafts did your editor read?

Okay, some of this is working off of memory, because GHOST’s revisions started more than three years ago and I haven’t hung on to the ed. letters. (I kind of wish I had, as mementos of the process, but I’ve moved twice since then and you get to a point where anything you don’t absolutely have to hold on to, you chuck rather than find another box for it.)

The first editorial revision I did for GHOST was before it sold–an editor at Holt was interested but wanted some changes made before bringing it to acquisitions. That letter came by e-mail and was quite short (since it’s electronic I still have it so I can check): a little more than a page. It focused on one major character issue the editor had. I didn’t have to make any big changes, but I did need to adjust Cass’s voice and actions across the entire book, so I did a full rewrite.

That editor loved the rewrite, and was able to offer on the book. After which we went through three rounds of revisions. The first letter was about eight pages, I think, and involved taking out a subplot and replacing the scenes that referred to it with others, some more minor character and plot tweaking, and altering the pacing and some of the events at the climax and ending. The second (about four pages) was mostly small tweaks with some more changes to the ending and the third was line edits, so all in the marked up manuscript. (All three revision notes included a marked up manuscript as well as the letters.) For each of those I just made changes as I went and rewrote scenes only when necessary rather than rewriting the whole thing. Then we were on to copy-edits!

So in total… My editor read the original submission, the pre-offer revision I did for her, that revision again when she was coming up with the first editorial letter and marking up the manuscript, the first post-offer revision, the second post-offer revision, the third post-offer revision, the copy-edited manuscript, and the page proofs. So she read it at least eight times! Just one reason why an editor has to really be in love with a book to make an offer on it. Can you imagine reading the same book eight times in the course of a year and a half?

There is no right way

August 5th, 2010

The one thing I stress above everything else when I give author talks is that there is no one right way to write. Everyone has a different creative process, and different things work for different people, and so when I talk about how I work, it isn’t meant as a guideline or a set of rules, only one example out of many.

It’s tricky trying to make a go of it as a writer. With most professions, there are sets of procedures in place that everyone follows. You go to school for the job you want to do, you learn the correct way to do it, and then you go out and get to it. There are details that differ from person to person, but the basic steps that make up their day to day work stay pretty much the same.

In the creative world, it’s totally different. Some writers swear by outlines, others find them stifling. Some write multiple drafts, others write one and revise as they go. Some need total quiet to get into the zone, others thrive on the bustle of activity around them.

But I think, as human beings, we want guidelines. We want to know there’s a correct way to do things, and that if we follow it, we’ll succeed. Not having that security can be terrifying. And that fear can make it even harder to succeed, because it’s so easy to get stuck in a process that doesn’t work for you, or for this particular book, because you’re afraid to do it some other way that seems unprecedented.

So, to anyone reading this who is involved in any sort of creative occupation, I offer two statements I think every artist should remember:

Just because any given successful author (or other artist) works a certain way, there is no guarantee following their methods will make you successful.

After all, the reason there are so many different methods out there–outline vs. pants it, fast draft vs. revise as you go, etc.–is that creativity functions differently from person to person. Outlining a book makes me even more excited about working on it, but for many other authors, it kills a feeling of spontaneity that they need to stay in love with the book. Whereas if I attempt to jump right into a story without pre-planning, I soon feel lost and unhappy. Neither approach is right or wrong, they’re just right for some people and wrong for others. For every “rule” that one author might insist on, there’s at least one other author who could never finish a story that way.

Which is to say, by all means try out different methods. How are you going to find what works best for you if you don’t? But if one method is making you want to write less, or increasingly unhappy with what you’re writing, don’t keep at it just because a bunch of authors you admire do it. And don’t ditch a method that you enjoy just because you see other writers talking about how impossible it would be for them to write that way. The only correct way to write is the way that sees you eventually writing The End, and feeling good about it.

It’s hard to feel confident when there’s no real right answer. I know–I’ve sold four books now, and I still worry sometimes that maybe I should be doing this or that technique that others swear by, and that if I did my writing would rise to some higher level. But I’m getting better at not listening to that worry, because every time I have, the writing that comes out feels flat or stilted, and I end up going back to my old ways.

That said…

Be flexible in your own process.

Someone (I don’t remember who–if you know, mention it in the comments so I can credit them!) has commented that you don’t learn how to write a book, you learn how to write this book. Every book demands something new from its author–and if a book doesn’t, you’re probably rehashing stories you’ve already told. So it shouldn’t be surprising that now and then a method that you’re used to following just doesn’t feel right for this particular book. Or a given story calls on you to try something you haven’t before.

Again, I think this can be scary. Once you have your system set, the idea of messing with it might seem to spell disaster. But if the feeling that you should change is coming from you and your interaction with the story, not from some outside pressure, my experience is it’s generally best to listen. Creativity is never static: it shifts and evolves as you develop your craft.

I’ve seen my own process change in a couple of ways over the last year. For one, I used to be the queen of fast-drafting. I’ve written a full rough draft in as little as three weeks. I still write comparatively fast, but with my last couple projects, I’ve found myself wanting to take the first draft a little slower, to spend more time thinking scenes through rather than throwing them onto the page as I outlined them and hurrying on. It used to be that if I didn’t get the first draft down ASAP, I’d lose confidence and have trouble reaching the end. But these days, making sure I’m reasonably happy with what I’m writing as I’m writing it keeps that confidence going. And even though it means the first draft takes longer, it means fewer revisions down the road, so I don’t really mind. :)

These days we’re taught more to pay attention to facts than follow our instincts. But as a creative person, I think the best thing you can do is learn to listen to those instincts, and let them lead you to the way that’s right for you.

Three things that make me happy today

August 4th, 2010

1. I just signed my contract with Hyperion! Which makes the new books feel even more officially official.

2. I passed 25,000 words (a.k.a. 100 pages) on my current WIP last night. Almost at the halfway mark! And still mostly liking it (and with a rough draft, ‘mostly’ is about as good as it gets ;) ).

3. I’m going to hang out with a bunch of other Toronto kids and YA authors tonight after work. Yay! The TorKidLit group gets together once a month to hang out and talk shop, and it’s always a great time. As much as I adore my online writer buddies, there’s nothing like getting to chat with other writers in person.

Your turn: What’s making you happy today?

Paperback of GHOST, and more overseas news!

July 30th, 2010

I don’t know for sure how official the date is, but if Amazon is at least reasonably accurate, the paperback of GIVE UP THE GHOST should be available sometime next spring! Which means there will be more giveaways and other fun stuff to come when we get closer to that time. :D

And… I’ve just gotten word that GIVE UP THE GHOST will be published in Germany (in paperback) by Verlagsgruppe Oetinger! Not sure when yet, but I will keep you posted as details come in.

Since we’re talking paperbacks, I’m curious: what format do you prefer, hardcover or paperback?

Me, I like paperbacks because they’re lighter and smaller so easier to carry, I can fit more of them on my bookshelves, and since they’re less expensive I can buy more of them. But for books released as both, the benefit of the hardcover is obviously I get to read it a lot sooner! So my purchases tend to be split about 50/50 depending on how willing I am to wait.

Reader Question: Naming characters

July 28th, 2010

How do you go about deciding character names? Is it something you put a lot of thought into? Or something that just springs on you as you plan? Why was Cass, Cass?

I pick names mostly by feel. The associations I have with the name, and whether that seems to fit the particular character. For Cass, I’d always liked the name Cassie, and I also liked the mythological association (in Greek mythology, Cassandra was a woman cursed to make true prophecies about the future and have no one believe her–granted, people do believe Cass at least some of the time, but she does speak a lot of truth no one wants to hear). And as I got to know her character, I knew she’d have shortened her name from the softer sounding “Cassie” to the more no-nonsense “Cass” as part of her transformation after junior high.


The original Cassandra

I do give a lot of thought to finding the best name possible, though, and they don’t always just come to me. I often flip through my baby name book (I use 1000,000+ BABY NAMES) once I’m getting close to the outlining stage of a story idea and jot down any names that jump out at me and fit the tone or setting of the book or one particular character. Then I pick out the names for all the main and secondary characters I know about, trying to make sure that none of the names sound too similar. (For ex, I avoid where possible having more than one character’s name start with the same letter, unless they’re otherwise very distinct from each other, e.g., in my current WIP I have a Jena and a Joss.) The list also comes in handy as I’m writing and minor characters pop up who need names.

What I find most interesting about character names is how the characters themselves use them. Like Cass shortening her name from Cassie, and which characters refer to her the new nickname or stick to the old one. In the WIP mentioned above, my main character is a pretty manipulative guy, and one of the ways you see that is in how he adapts people’s names: using childish or girly (for a guy) nicknames with people he wants to assert himself over, or giving a tough new nickname to someone whose confidence he’s trying to build.

Now I have a question for all you readers: What’s your favorite character name, and why? (from any book)

My book’s becoming a world traveler!

July 27th, 2010

Guess what, Spanish, German, and Brazilian readers: You’re going to be able to pick up THE WAY WE FALL, its sequel, and my third book with Hyperion in your own language!

I am super pleased (and super thankful for my most awesome agent and his awesome associates who’ve been working on the books’ behalf overseas) to announce that all three books have sold in Spain to Roca Editorial, in Brazil to Intrinseca, and in Germany to Fischer Schatzinsel. And if you prefer to listen to your books rather than read them, there’ll be a North American audio version of all three from Recorded Books!

Foreign editions and audio books are brand new to me, so I can’t wait to discover all that goes along with them (alternate covers! voice actors!) and to share it all with you. :)