Archive for the ‘Discussion’ Category

Reader Question: Early Inspiration

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

Was there a specific author or book that inspired you to become a writer?

The short answer is, no.

The long answer is–I would never say I wasn’t inspired by the authors I read while I was growing up. I devoured all the Zilpha Keatley Snyder and Roald Dahl books I could find, and re-read my favorites (THE CHANGELING and THE WITCHES, respectively) over and over, for example. Those books definitely influenced the paths I took with my writing.

But, I think I was bound to become a writer before I even knew how to read. I loved stories from the first time my parents started reading picture books to me, and right away I was trying to make up my own (dictating to my mom so she could transcribe them, since I didn’t yet know how to print, either). There was never a moment when I read a particular book and thought, wow, I want to do this too. I was already doing it. I’ve never known how to not do it.

Fellow writers–did you have a moment of inspiration when you decided to pursue writing? Or was it something that just sort of happened?

There is no right way

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

The one thing I stress above everything else when I give author talks is that there is no one right way to write. Everyone has a different creative process, and different things work for different people, and so when I talk about how I work, it isn’t meant as a guideline or a set of rules, only one example out of many.

It’s tricky trying to make a go of it as a writer. With most professions, there are sets of procedures in place that everyone follows. You go to school for the job you want to do, you learn the correct way to do it, and then you go out and get to it. There are details that differ from person to person, but the basic steps that make up their day to day work stay pretty much the same.

In the creative world, it’s totally different. Some writers swear by outlines, others find them stifling. Some write multiple drafts, others write one and revise as they go. Some need total quiet to get into the zone, others thrive on the bustle of activity around them.

But I think, as human beings, we want guidelines. We want to know there’s a correct way to do things, and that if we follow it, we’ll succeed. Not having that security can be terrifying. And that fear can make it even harder to succeed, because it’s so easy to get stuck in a process that doesn’t work for you, or for this particular book, because you’re afraid to do it some other way that seems unprecedented.

So, to anyone reading this who is involved in any sort of creative occupation, I offer two statements I think every artist should remember:

Just because any given successful author (or other artist) works a certain way, there is no guarantee following their methods will make you successful.

After all, the reason there are so many different methods out there–outline vs. pants it, fast draft vs. revise as you go, etc.–is that creativity functions differently from person to person. Outlining a book makes me even more excited about working on it, but for many other authors, it kills a feeling of spontaneity that they need to stay in love with the book. Whereas if I attempt to jump right into a story without pre-planning, I soon feel lost and unhappy. Neither approach is right or wrong, they’re just right for some people and wrong for others. For every “rule” that one author might insist on, there’s at least one other author who could never finish a story that way.

Which is to say, by all means try out different methods. How are you going to find what works best for you if you don’t? But if one method is making you want to write less, or increasingly unhappy with what you’re writing, don’t keep at it just because a bunch of authors you admire do it. And don’t ditch a method that you enjoy just because you see other writers talking about how impossible it would be for them to write that way. The only correct way to write is the way that sees you eventually writing The End, and feeling good about it.

It’s hard to feel confident when there’s no real right answer. I know–I’ve sold four books now, and I still worry sometimes that maybe I should be doing this or that technique that others swear by, and that if I did my writing would rise to some higher level. But I’m getting better at not listening to that worry, because every time I have, the writing that comes out feels flat or stilted, and I end up going back to my old ways.

That said…

Be flexible in your own process.

Someone (I don’t remember who–if you know, mention it in the comments so I can credit them!) has commented that you don’t learn how to write a book, you learn how to write this book. Every book demands something new from its author–and if a book doesn’t, you’re probably rehashing stories you’ve already told. So it shouldn’t be surprising that now and then a method that you’re used to following just doesn’t feel right for this particular book. Or a given story calls on you to try something you haven’t before.

Again, I think this can be scary. Once you have your system set, the idea of messing with it might seem to spell disaster. But if the feeling that you should change is coming from you and your interaction with the story, not from some outside pressure, my experience is it’s generally best to listen. Creativity is never static: it shifts and evolves as you develop your craft.

I’ve seen my own process change in a couple of ways over the last year. For one, I used to be the queen of fast-drafting. I’ve written a full rough draft in as little as three weeks. I still write comparatively fast, but with my last couple projects, I’ve found myself wanting to take the first draft a little slower, to spend more time thinking scenes through rather than throwing them onto the page as I outlined them and hurrying on. It used to be that if I didn’t get the first draft down ASAP, I’d lose confidence and have trouble reaching the end. But these days, making sure I’m reasonably happy with what I’m writing as I’m writing it keeps that confidence going. And even though it means the first draft takes longer, it means fewer revisions down the road, so I don’t really mind. :)

These days we’re taught more to pay attention to facts than follow our instincts. But as a creative person, I think the best thing you can do is learn to listen to those instincts, and let them lead you to the way that’s right for you.

Paperback of GHOST, and more overseas news!

Friday, July 30th, 2010

I don’t know for sure how official the date is, but if Amazon is at least reasonably accurate, the paperback of GIVE UP THE GHOST should be available sometime next spring! Which means there will be more giveaways and other fun stuff to come when we get closer to that time. :D

And… I’ve just gotten word that GIVE UP THE GHOST will be published in Germany (in paperback) by Verlagsgruppe Oetinger! Not sure when yet, but I will keep you posted as details come in.

Since we’re talking paperbacks, I’m curious: what format do you prefer, hardcover or paperback?

Me, I like paperbacks because they’re lighter and smaller so easier to carry, I can fit more of them on my bookshelves, and since they’re less expensive I can buy more of them. But for books released as both, the benefit of the hardcover is obviously I get to read it a lot sooner! So my purchases tend to be split about 50/50 depending on how willing I am to wait.

Reader Question: Romance

Monday, May 31st, 2010

Do you feel like not putting the main characters in a romantic relationship in GIVE UP THE GHOST affected your book’s reception?

Excellent question!

No matter what a writer does with his or her story, some readers will love it and others will wish it were some other way. As I’ve talked about before, you can’t please everyone! And the same is true for my decision to keep Cass and Tim’s relationship platonic. I’ve read some reviews where the reader praised the book for not going the traditional route of having the two main characters fall in love, or who liked the idea of a romance but could see that it wouldn’t have felt believable if I’d tried to include that. I’ve read others where the reader was disappointed by the lack of romance and enjoyed the book less because of it. I think some readers even felt there was a romance, and I just never let the characters act on it. :) A lot of that has to do with perceptions: almost all the paranormal YA out there has a strong romantic element in it right now, and so many readers came to GHOST with certain expectations.

But would more people have been happy if I’d had Cass and Tim get lovey-dovey? It’s impossible to say. I think it’s likely that for every reader right now who wishes there was a romance, there’s another who’d have complained about it being predictable or unbelievable if I’d written one in.

And even if more people would have liked a romance than not… Ultimately I have to do what feels best for my characters, in my story. I don’t believe that Cass or Tim were ready to get romantic with anyone, even at the end of the novel. They came a long way, but they still have a lot further to go. I also didn’t want to give the impression that people have to be in love to help each other. Cass and Tim are just two people connecting as people, like so many other friendships out there.

So that’s the way I wrote it. I’m much happier writing what feels right than trying to predict what the greatest number of readers will want, and I think it makes for a better, truer story, too.

My question for you, blog readers: When you were in your teens (or right now, if you currently are), did you get more emotional support from your friends or from your romantic partners?

Team Peeta, Team Gale… Team Katniss?

Saturday, May 1st, 2010

The release date for the third HUNGER GAMES book, MOCKINGJAY, is getting closer, and the question I most often see people speculating about is, “Which boy will Katniss end up with?” And I thought, it’s interesting that what engages many people most about even a book that includes revolution and gladiator-type tournaments and government oppression is the romantic element.

And then I thought, is that really true? Or do readers only react that way because Katniss is female, and popular culture generally defines finding “true love” as the most important goal for a woman? A lot of people wondered who Harry Potter would be dating, for example, but the most pressing questions for him seemed to be ones like “How will he defeat Voldemort?” and “Will he survive?”

What do you think? If the HUNGER GAMES trilogy were about a boy who went into the games in his younger brother’s place, would the main topic of discussion be which girl he’d end up with?

Reader Question: Ghosts

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Do you believe in ghosts and have you ever seen or felt the presence of a ghost? If yes, please tell! And if no, would you like to?

When it comes to most things paranormal, I consider myself an open-minded skeptic. I don’t believe ghosts definitely exist, because I’ve never had an experience or come across evidence that convinced me of it. But I don’t believe they definitely don’t exist, either, because I have heard many stories from many other people that are very convincing, even if not quite enough to decide me.

I’ve never seen a ghost myself, that I know of. One time, when I was a teenager living at my parents house, one of our cats started acting very strangely, reacting as if there was something very scary under my bed. He sprang across the room, flailed and scratched me when I tried to pick him up, and then ran out and sat at the top of the stairs staring at the bed through my open door for quite a while. He’d formerly loved to hide under it and for months afterward completely avoided it. I wondered if there was some sort of presence there that he sensed but I didn’t.

Would I like to? You know, if ghosts do exist, I think I’d want to see one simply so that I would know for sure. I’m always the sort of person who’d rather know what’s going on than not.

What about you? Have you ever seen a ghost, or evidence one was around?

Reader Question: Writer’s Block

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

What do you do when you get a serious case of writer’s block? What do you do to get through it?

To be honest, I don’t get anything I would call writer’s block. I do have a number of points in the writing process where I may find it difficult/impossible to write, that someone else might use that label for, though. But to me “writer’s block” has the connotations of something unnatural, that we’d want to do away with completely, and all those points for me are a normal part of the process.

Sometimes I can’t write because I don’t have any projects on the go, and none of the ideas I’ve been playing with feel quite ready yet. This can be very frustrating, but I’ve learned from experience that if I try to make an idea work when it’s only half-baked, the end result is half-baked, too. When this happens, I try to give myself lots of opportunity to take in inspiring material–books, music, movies, art–until I find the missing pieces for one of those ideas and it’s ready to be written. I also look through my notes on other ideas and random snippets that seemed interesting in case I’ve forgotten something or might see two elements that would work together in a way that hadn’t occurred to me before.

Sometimes I have an idea I think is ready to be written, and I start outlining it, and partway through I get stuck. Most of the time this means that the idea wasn’t really ready after all, and I need to do some more brainstorming and inspiration-seeking to fill in the gaps. Occasionally, like with my current WIP, I start writing based on the beginning of my outline, and spending time with the characters and situation helps me figure out what needs to happen later on.

And sometimes I get stuck in the middle of writing a draft. This happens most often during the first draft, but sometimes later on, too, and it means one of two things.

It can mean that I’ve messed something up–I didn’t really understand my main character’s motivations, and I just realized they don’t make sense for what needs to happen in the story now. I totally forgot to consider how a subplot is going to affect the main plot, and everything has to change. That sort of thing. In those cases, I either re-outline the rest of the story to get things on the right course and continue on pretending that I was going the right way all along (with the intention of going back and fixing the earlier stuff in the next draft), or I start over from the beginning immediately. That depends on how big a change it is (the bigger the change, the harder to course-correct without fixing what’s before) and how far I’m already into the story (the further I’m in, the less I want to start all over again).

It can also mean I’m just having a lot of self-doubt. I’m not really stuck, I’m just afraid that what I’m writing is bad, and that if I sit down and write more, it’ll be even worse. I get this during every first draft, because it’s a lot scarier to write when the story isn’t all on the page yet, and I’m not totally sure I will get to The End. The way I deal with that is, I write those first drafts as fast as I can, to get as much down as I can before the doubts start creeping in, and to get to that magical The End place as quickly as possible after they do. I have a schedule when I’m working on a draft where I write every day after breakfast, before I’m allowed to go online, and so even if I procrastinate for a little while before I get myself into the writing chair, I get there. I remind myself that I always feel that way with a first draft, and all I have to do is get through it, and I’ll feel better. And usually once I get past the first few painful sentences, it starts flowing, and it all gets easier. At least until I have to sit down the next day. :)

(Self-doubt is my least favorite of the above, but you know what, I wouldn’t do away with it completely, either. Doubt is what keeps us trying to write the best stories we can, pushing ourselves to do better.)

Writer friends–do you get what you’d consider writer’s block? How do you deal when you’re having trouble getting the words down?

We can write in omniscient but we’re not omnipotent

Friday, March 12th, 2010

I think one of the most important things any writer who is or is attempting to be published has to realize is that as soon as you share that story with anyone other than yourself, you not longer have control over its content. And that the more people read it, the less control you have.

That might sound counterfactual. After all, as the author you do control which words you have put on the page and which ones you haven’t. (You can argue that once we get into the editing stage that’s not entirely true, but ultimately any change even if pressed on you is one you accepted in one way or another, and besides that’s not where I’m going with this.) And the words are the content, right?

Except that they’re not.

The words are more like a guidebook to the story you want your readers to be experiencing. You are trying to tell them what this story’s about and how they should feel about it, but ultimately it’s their trip and they’ll go where they want to go with the maps provided. The content is the story that plays out in their heads when they read those words, which is a very different thing from words themselves.

You already know this is true. You have formed, at least once, an image in your head of a main character in a book you’re reading, only to be completely thrown when halfway through the author mentions that redhead you’ve been picturing is blond. You have commented to a friend about how noble character A was, only to have them scoff and claim he was clearly acting under selfish motivations. You have re-read a story you first read years ago, and discovered that the subplot you thought was so depressing is actually hilarious (or vice versa).

I wanted to say that authors and readers split control over the story about 50/50, but it might actually be more like 10/90. All we do is offer the best words we can come up with. Each reader brings to those words a lifetime of associations and experiences and knowledge and understanding that color and warp them, sometimes beyond recognition.

None of that means that authors shouldn’t try to write the story they intend as clearly and powerfully as they can manage. Even 10% makes a big difference, and the better you write it, the more of the story in your head is likely to get into the readers’. And it doesn’t mean that you should ignore feedback on your writing, because you know what? If nine out of ten critiquers are finding your incredibly sweet protagonist terribly obnoxious, the error’s in your guidebook, not their imagination.

What it means is, you will be a much happier person if you recognize that no matter what words you’ve put on that page, or how long you slaved over them, every single wrong turn a reader could make, someone somewhere will make it.

Someone will think that scene that brought others to tears is trite. Someone will say the story moves way too fast, and someone else will call it ploddingly boring. You can never include so much of X that no one will think it’s not enough, or so little that no one will complain you’ve gone overboard. In short, you will never ever ever be able to make every reader, or even most readers, love the story or any one part of it the way you do. And even the readers who do love it may very well love it for reasons you didn’t intend. And that’s okay, because that’s inevitable, and it’s the same for everyone who’s ever written down words for other people to read.

So just write the best guidebooks you can, and wish your readers well on whatever journey they end up on, and try to laugh instead of cry if they end up lost in a swamp instead of gasping at the awesome cliff-top view you meant to lead them to.

Truth in my fiction

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Today I’m guest-posting over at Fodder For Fiction, where I talk about how real life helped shape the writing of GIVE UP THE GHOST. With a snippet of a flashback for illustration!

Read the post here.

I’ll be checking comments there and here. :)

Books in diary format

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Every book brings new challenges, and my current project is no exception. The biggest of them? I’m writing it not just in first person POV (like GHOST), but in the form of the main character’s journal entries.

It’s interesting how much of a difference it makes to how the story gets told. I think there’s at least as much difference between regular first person and diary first person as there is between first person and (limited) third. I have to consider not just the character’s voice, but timing (when during these events will she have time to write?), content (what sorts of things would she bother to mention in her journal? what might she leave out?), and style (she might think something one way, but would she actually phrase it like that when writing it down?). It makes certain aspects harder (can’t have a cliffhanger in the middle of the action!) but other things more satisfying (there’s a reason this is all being written down, from her perspective, not just mine as the author).

How do you all feel about diary format in fiction? Do you enjoy it or avoid it? What things do you like about it, and what can bother you? Examples you think work particularly well (or not well) are welcome!